A repost today, from my garrulous days. Over a thousand words, oh my.
It’s in response to Side View’s weekend theme, Folly- you can find her challenge here. Apologies to Cindy and the old timers who have been along for most of the ride 🙂
Someone appears inadvertently to have left a toilet in the forest.
It is perched on the edge of our iron age fort with a view to die for. It sits stolidly at the summit of a plummeting earthwork planted with tall beeches and hazels. It has the air of a union man.
It does not blend in: it is bright blue. It is the epitome of utilitarian practicality, though. I wonder if the workmen who have been there for a month have remembered yet that they left their toilet behind?
I can see them all, in the middle of a cup of char, just about to crank up the digger, when someone claps their hands to their forehead.
“Stone me, left the toilet behind.”
Better not have too much tea, then. And steer clear of the bran muffins.
Still, this incongruous addition to the forest has its uses. While I haven’t tried the door (yet), I can imagine it could be very useful for dog walkers and runners, caught short after stumbling out into the early morning, desperate to get in some exercise before the busy day begins.
But there is nothing pretty about it. We leave pretty and impractical to the follies.
These are buildings conceived and built in whimsy. Some authorities, including the Oxford Dictionary, have branded them the costly result of foolishness.
This morning I heard some news about a folly which is rather special to me.
My old college is housed in one of the most extravagant Georgian buildings of its time: Strawberry Hill, the frothy confection created by Horace Walpole.
Walpole was a poet, writer and MP from the top drawer of society. He was the fourth son of prime minister Sir Robert Walpole. He had spent the Summer holiday of his eighth year by the river in Twickenham, and he loved it.
At 30 years old, he realised his dream of acquiring a small house near the Thames at Strawberry Hill. And then began a life’s work to transform a small, unassuming country house into a gothic castle.
He was at the forefront of this ‘gothick’ craze of the 18th century. While reasoned liberals favoured the measured style of classicism, conservative minds looked back to mediaeval times to inspire a romanticism, and an expression of all that was great about Blighty.
Ever industrious, Walpole was not content with asking friends to advise him on this ripping new adventure.
No, he appointed a committee. It was called a ‘Committee of Taste’. It consisted of himself, John Chute – Walpole’s ‘Oracle Of Taste’, whom he met while travelling – and Richard Bentley, a skilled artist and draftsman.
This was not a scholarly trip down memory lane. It was an eclectic bag of tricks that inspired Walpole’s glorious folly.
He visited gothic buildings whenever he could. Whenever he couldn’t, he pored over books of mediaeval architecture. He sketched the details he liked, whether domestic or ecclesiastical, and then he found a way to incorporate them into his castle.
Walpole was very up-front about this. He told a friend in a letter that the rooms at Strawberry Hill were ‘more the works of fancy than of imitation.”
Thus, a gothic south front was added to the building, complete with battlements and pinnacles, clad immaculately in white plaster; a round tower was built: and inside was a feast of gothic staircases, fireplaces, stone arches, wallpaper and fretwork.
He spent £21,000 on this whimsical wonder, a fortune in the eighteenth century. The architecture of St Pancras Station and the Houses of Parliament followed where Strawberry Hill led the way. And today we have learnt that Walpole’s folly reopens very soon after a thorough restoration, which has cost of £9 million.
Walpole described the house as being made of paper and fabric. It wasn’t concieved as being a permanent gift to posterity. And yet here it is, hundreds of years later, being celebrated not in spite of, but because of its folly.
So why did he do it? Why does anyone make something pretty and foolish and expensive? A clue comes at the end of Walpole’s Parish Register of Twickenham, a list of the local VIPs. He writes: “Enough if I consign, to lasting type their notes divine: Enough, if Strawberry’s humble-hill the title page of fame shall fill.’
And there it is. The F word: fame. All is vanity, and we will go to many lengths to gain fame and occasionally notoriety. A place in the history books can be secured through gainful toil, great leadership or high birth. But a place may also be gained through other means at one’s disposal.
As Becky Sharp ably demonstrated.
She was the work of a fellow hack, William Makepiece Thackeray. This man knew what it was to skim by the seat of one’s nineteenth century britches, eking out a living by writing.
On an erudite day he might contribute to the Times: on a less august, and slightly more wicked day, it could be Punch. He said himself, he ‘wrote for his life’.
The man was incisive, and clever and occasionally merciless. In his great work, Vanity Fair, he seemed to be able to see through the surface glamour and vanity of society to the human dealings beneath.
Becky is the ultimate anti-heroine. She is clever and resourceful, with utter focus and total ruthlessness. She cares, it seems, for no-one. Her child is neglected and she treads on others to reach ever greater heights as she climbs the English social ladder.
Around her, but somehow a little less vivid, are the good guys, gentlewoman Amelia and military man Dobbin, who have built their life on solid values. They go through intense suffering as they tramp through a veritable soap opera set in the Napoleonic Wars. And Becky gets very close to the top, by championing vanity.
Vile woman, but oh, so colourful.
She uses every means in her power to court fame, using vanity. There is nothing utilitarian about her methods. In the end, the tower of notoriety she built amongst the upper classes was a tall, striking folly.
Like sugar, a little vanity goes a long way. It’s fine for building follies, but not a great foundation for a life.
Give me the honest, utilitarian comfort of a toilet in the forest any day.
24 thoughts on “Vanity”
hmmmmmmmmmm. a mistake, but would you call the blue-block a folly?
Love the links, what a great tour, around and back again.
The blue block is the most sensible of todays subjects, Sidey 😀 Just ask the workmen who left it behind…
the air of a union man – of course not being British I did know the meaning of this reference but can suppose it is a slap at one’s political rivals, eh?
Nope, Carl, a friendly nudge to one’s friends. Here, our unions are full of forthright commonsensical down-to-earth blokes who know what they like and like what they know. But without the unions, where would we be? Our teaching unions are indispensable. They ensure equity.
I remember this, it may be the first post I read of yours. Delightful still 🙂
Seems a long time ago, doesn’t it?
I see two follies here: the folly of the workmen in leaving the loo behind and then Walpole’s folly. Interesting post, well written as usual, Kate. I thoroughly enjoyed it.
Thanks Adee. The workmens’ folly, I suspect, is the most pressing 😀
Bravo, what a fabulous post. Now, is it vanity or folly, that I would eschew the blue and seek a thick grove of trees instead?
A woman after my own heart! And you have supplied the material for a whole new post with your question, Angela 🙂
Loved this post, especially as I visited Strawberry Hill for the first time this week. 9 million has been spent on this folly, but I think it will require a lot more to complete. The big surprise to me was that it is semi-detached unlike your loo sitting in its own grounds.
Walpole made such a lot out of what began as a fairly humble establishment, didn’t he? I am envious of your visit because I have not been to see it in its latest incarnation: it’s on my list. I am irresistibly drawn to his idiosyncratic form of overstatement…
I was laughing even before I started reading 🙂 Spurs Fan trained at Strawberry Hill also, but has never mentioned the folly, which sounds to be worth seeing. he must have been working too hard to have noticed it…
If he’s my generation it would have been shabby indeed, Speccy: you could still just discern the old girl underneath the grime though 🙂
The joy of a re-post for we newcomers. Thanks 🙂
Lovely to get it out of the WordPress attic and dust it off, Tilly….
Ackershally, I think I’d rather ‘go’ in the forest than a Portaloo…. all that chemical smell reminds me too much of damp camping 🙂
I can’t find the links that Sidey mentions, is it me? I have been up rather a long time for a Saturday morning.
As you will recall, Pseu, you taught me how to link….so this early post doesn’t have any….I took sideys comment in the sense of old fashioned links between subjects.
Totally agree on the portaloo.
..takes me back to the days of camping in the new forest…*shudder*
Lovely romp through the woods . . . past the Blue Loo! 😀
To Vanity Fair . . . and a bit of Folly.
A little now and then does no harm, does it, Nancy?
Kate, may I point you in the direction of this post as I think you may find it interesting? –
Always a pleasure to be pointed in a direction by you, Pseu 🙂