The Scary Madonna

madonna1

I mentioned that I was much taken by the down-to-earth faces which look down from the masonry at St Cross Hospital, Winchester.

I also let slip that there was one notable exception to those which simply made one feel comfortable.

I walked through the arch under the gatehouse and her eyes were upon me; so much so that I felt compelled to turn and meet her gaze.

She was no mediaeval grotesque, and no Renaissance gargoyle. She appeared to be relatively recent, though her son has not worn so well.

She has the magnetism of the Mona Lisa, but the enigmatic smile is missing. Instead, there is something steely about this madonna. One would not choose to cross her.

I did not ask after her that day, and have drawn a blank on her since. My guess? 19th century. Pre-Raphaelite, even.

Whatever she is, wherever she came from, I find her rather disturbing. Because she looks alive, though she is grey. That gaze could lock you, standing there beneath. She is a formidable figure.

See what you think.

Advertisements

29 thoughts on “The Scary Madonna

  1. ‘Forbidding’ is the description that springs to my mind. I too find this glance daunting, but it could be due to the angle a pedestrian sees her from. Up at her level she may still be looking down but there might at least be the faint glimmer of a smile that we can’t see.

    Or, if St Cross is High Church (which I suspect is so) then her cold look could be a reference to the Catholic concept of Mater Dolorosa, where the BVM (despite holding the Saviour King in her arms) is aware of Jesus’ death and of the sins of mankind that brought him there. The Seven Sorrows of Mary they’re called, a medieval devotion that’s still popular with devout Catholics now. And particularly apt considering the Hospital’s dedication to the cross.

    As a counterbalance to all this negativity, there’s a more upbeat English folksong you may know called The Seven Joys of Mary (http://www.8notes.com/digital_tradition/SEVNJOYS.asp, though this isn’t the version of the tune I remember).

      1. I’ve sung the mixed choir version of the Britten with harp, but this version is lovelier — and the boys choir original even more so. Beautiful photos too.

  2. I haven’t been aware of such elaborate crowns on many of the Madonnas. It appears to be very large and is certainly intricate, accentuating the title “Queen of Heaven.” I see kind of a noble and austere expression that I associate with royalty, but I do prefer more “maternal” madonnas. One thing for sure, she demanded attention and was was following you with her eyes. I wonder if she could read your mind?

  3. She makes sense to me… One would have to be made of stern stuff to mother such a man, to bear witness to such a life in one’s child. Whether divine or not, she must have been a force to be reckoned with in her way. Why not allow her to look that way?

  4. I do rather like her face. Very human. . .perhaps Jesus’ “nappy” is wet? Or maybe worse? Interesting that the weather has been harsher to the baby than to the Mum. Much as history has been, and the church, unfortunately! ๐Ÿ˜†

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s