Uniting the Angels

Screen Shot 2014-07-26 at 08.42.42

New age, old age, any age: they fit wherever.

Angels are the symbol of eternity. Of serenity. Of ablution. A sure sign that one is bound heavenwards. And I have such a story of angels today as will make you gasp with amazement and ask: How? How is it we never heard this before?

Dictators can be brutes. They stand on the shoulders of those who used talent and guile to get themselves where they are. They stand there, sanctioned by power, and take what they want.

Such a dictator was Henry VIII, and a man with girth like that demanded strong shoulders indeed. You will all be familiar with one such set of shoulders, a butcher’s lad who rose to be Henry’s right hand man: a man of god, a man of letters and a man of wealth and taste.

Cardinal Thomas Wolsey. The man who remodelled Hampton Court as a Renaissance Cardinal’s Palace, who stood astride the English world like a colossus, and who, like most of Henry’s props, fell suddenly.

Henry wanted to remarry, and Anne Boleyn’s people convinced him Wolsey was slowing things down. He arranged Wolsey’s toppling with a charge of treason (Wolsey cheated him by dying of natural causes on the way home) and then nabbed Hampton Court. This much is plain, common knowledge.

Poor Wolsey. His plans for his death were elaborate. He had one of the foremost sculptors of the day, Benedetto De Rovezzano – a man who could sculpt Elysium with his lithe fingers  – and Giovanni Da Maianno create a tomb fit for an emperor.

At its four corners stood four heavenly angels. Not just your average stone angels. These were something sublime: something so beautiful it still takes one’s breath away, just to see them.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Henry acquired the tomb, of course.

He took one look and thought: I shall better that. And he went back to Benedetto, and demanded it be transformed into an even grander tomb.

I have told the story of the tomb before: how all Henry’s schemes came to nothing because his taciturn daughter allowed them to flounder. He never got his tomb, and was buried in a vault beneath St George’s Chapel in Windsor Castle. Nelson got the black sarcophagus eventually.

But the angels?

No-one knows what happened to them. They disappeared without trace, moved first to Windsor Castle and sold off during the Civil War. The trail had gone cold.

Sotheby’s Auction House, 1994: a lot labelled “Two bronze angels in the Renaissance style” went up for sale. It took an art historian and some considerable resources to realise that these were two of the four missing angels from Wolsey’s tomb.

And once you know what you are looking for, the angels are easier to spot. The other two were tracked down at Harrowden Hall in Northampstonshire. For centuries, it transpired, all four angels had stood together at the Hall’s gates.

Now they are with two different owners, though they are on temporary display in Gallery 50 of the Victoria and Albert Museum in London. The Museum has an appeal to raise the £5 million it will take to reunite them permanently.

Such angels should be together,surely?

Advertisements

30 thoughts on “Uniting the Angels

  1. That’s interesting, Kate. Of course, I think they should be united. They’d look rather fitting here on the Cutoff (but, no, the deer would have their way with them, I’m sure). 🙂

  2. Sometimes it takes awhile for a wrong to be made right. I, too, think they should be reunited; maybe at the site of the Cardinal’s actual tomb? It appears from photos that there would be space there for them.

  3. You live and learn: thanks Kate, another intriguing post.

    Now, nobody’s asked the obvious questions, so I will. How do we know these are angels?

    Conventional angels have wings; these don’t, or if they had (made from a different material?) they lack them now.

    Conventional angels (unless they are identifiably male, like Michael — who might be the one with a helmet) are feminine or are at least androgynous in appearance. These figures are undoubtedly not the latter.

    Where are the other angelic identifiers: the thuribles, the flowing robes that cover their nakedness? These are classical supporters not classic heavenly creatures.

    And what are they carrying? Candlesticks? I’m not convinced. Poles for standards? Possibly. I find it all rather curious. Or are you planning further revelations in a follow up post?

  4. Kate,

    Once again you are able to take a little piece of history and make into an intriguing blog post. I find it interesting that two of the statues have the original copper/bronze patina from being exposed to the elements while two appear to have been cleaned at some point or been kept inside. As much as antique collectors look for the “natural aging” on items, I think the two non-patina statues are truer to their original form. Thanks for sharing what I could never afford to see in London!

    Patrick

  5. I hope you remembered the rule: “Don’t blink” 🙂
    Mind you, I’m sure these angels love being stared at and had no intention of turning sci-fi on you.
    I also love the way that Mary got her “revenge” on the father that set her aside like an old shoe – as an ex student put it so academically.

    Cheers Kate 🙂

  6. This story had me clapping my hands at the delight of finding the angels after their lengthy and mysterious disappearance. What joy there would be in being an art detective under such circumstances!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s